full-disclosure - Re: why not a sandbox

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <88e844b40909041152y3f55214es97d453d9d806d084@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 14:52:41 -0400
From: Guy <full-disclosure@...lamatix.com>
To: RandallM <randallm@...mail.com>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: why not a sandbox

On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 2:05 PM, RandallM<randallm@...mail.com> wrote:
> how come we just can't sandbox the browser in away from the system.

Who or what says you can't?

Guy

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/