full-disclosure - Re: why not a sandbox

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1252095175.4308.47.camel@hkb-desktop>
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2009 16:12:55 -0400
From: Kurth Bemis <kurth.bemis@...il.com>
To: RandallM <randallm@...mail.com>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: why not a sandbox

Check out:

http://www.sandboxie.com/
http://www.xenocode.com/Browsers/

~k

On Fri, 2009-09-04 at 13:05 -0500, RandallM wrote:
> how come we just can't sandbox the browser in away from the system.
> its the users that just get gmail and click links, watch youtube vids
> and check FaceBook and Mypace that infect the network!
> 

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/