full-disclosure - Re: why not a sandbox

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090906234517.EF7D220040@smtp.hushmail.com>
Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2009 19:45:17 -0400
From: "Elazar Broad" <elazar@...hmail.com>
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk, randallm@...mail.com
Subject: Re: why not a sandbox

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

http://www.sandboxie.com/

On Fri, 04 Sep 2009 14:05:24 -0400 RandallM <randallm@...mail.com>
wrote:
>how come we just can't sandbox the browser in away from the
>system.
>its the users that just get gmail and click links, watch youtube
>vids
>and check FaceBook and Mypace that infect the network!
>
>--
>been great, thanks
>a.k.a System
>
>_______________________________________________
>Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Charset: UTF8
Note: This signature can be verified at https://www.hushtools.com/verify
Version: Hush 3.0

wpwEAQECAAYFAkqkSY0ACgkQi04xwClgpZhUagP+M5dOmEce1r4B/+yj0n6pA73T6gaK
pGgL74XuFLJFFF1WoHFZG3mkePR/DZGyz+8dl7B/TSxpblXtC4df9FSU5ri1NyU/pPiZ
O7XvZPD0jL1zmGtysZc5NKa6/PAGwFSF0SsLPWStxCoVEg1QkOZWUCWkaSRczedGwyiK
4BEdaPo=
=7VkF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/