full-disclosure - Re: ICMPv4/IP fuzzer prototype.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <4AB289C7-86F7-4A82-8703-73D44A43F8A8@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:02:15 -0800
From: Andrew Farmer <andfarm@...il.com>
To: laurent gaffie <laurent.gaffie@...il.com>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: ICMPv4/IP fuzzer prototype.

On 22 Nov 2009, at 19:48, laurent gaffie wrote:
> Should be kweel for UTesting
> http://g-laurent.blogspot.com/2009/11/releasing-icmpv4ip-fuzzer-prototype.html
...
> Dont forget it's a prototype, and i ASSUME you know what you're doing, do not ask for help.

You definitely have to know what you're doing to run the code, as posting that to Blogspot has destroyed the indentation. :)

Also, random.randrange(...) is going to give you much better performance than random.choice(range(...)). Just sayin'.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/