full-disclosure - Re: Software developer looks at CRU code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6a5e46470911301400w60f84e93nd5296d48db026aa5@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:00:05 -0600
From: Rohit Patnaik <quanticle@...il.com>
To: Paul Schmehl <pschmehl_lists@...rr.com>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Software developer looks at CRU code

There's a question I ask whenever I hear a theory like this.  Cui bono?  Who
benefits?  Who is benefiting from the "climate change scaremongering"?  You
claim that trillions of dollars will need to be spent.  If its such a scam,
then who is scamming us?  The UN IPCC?  A mysterious cabal of alternative
energy companies?  The Trilateral Commission?

-- Rohit Patnaik

On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Paul Schmehl <pschmehl_lists@...rr.com>wrote:

> No ever stated that the climate wasn't changing.  It always is.  And
> there's
> nothing man can do to change that.  One major volcanic eruption does more
> damage to the climate than billions of people driving cars worldwide and in
> much less time.
>
> That would should be good stewards of the earth goes without question.
>  That we
> should do everything reasonable to reduce or eliminate pollution goes
> without
> question.
>
> But the scam that the global climate is changing so dramatically that we
> need
> to take urgent action and spend trillions of dollars worldwide to address
> the
> problem has been repeatedly exposed to be just that - a scam.  Since these
> particular "scientists" are the leading proponents of the man-made global
> warming theory and the driving force behind the UN's IPCC reports, that
> particular theory is called into serious question if not damaged
> irretrievably.
>
> Recent evidence shows that the globe is again cooling, a natural process
> that
> these fakers want to hide, because it runs counter to their claims,
> threatens
> their income stream and makes a mockery of their demands for immediate
> action
> to prevent the supposed coming disaster.
>
> --On Monday, November 30, 2009 06:35:50 -0600 Ali Raheem
> <ali.raheem@...glemail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Simply because a few scientist have found to be fraudulent it doesn't
> > mean the concept of Climate change is. Even if this was found to be
> > faked it is far from the only evidence.
> >
>
> --
> Paul Schmehl, Senior Infosec Analyst
> As if it wasn't already obvious, my opinions
> are my own and not those of my employer.
> *******************************************
> "It is as useless to argue with those who have
> renounced the use of reason as to administer
> medication to the dead." Thomas Jefferson
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>

Content of type "text/html" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/