lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <56FF6C2B-0346-4312-A323-3BB5196AB0E9@b3nji.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 17:19:37 +0000
From: Benji <me@...ji.com>
To: "noloader@...il.com" <noloader@...il.com>
Cc: "full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk" <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Subject: Re: iiscan

You didn't know that the Feds own hushmail?&€$#!!

Sent from my iPhone

On 7 Jan 2010, at 16:52, Jeffrey Walton <noloader@...il.com> wrote:

> Hi Robin,
>
> Suppose that acquiring the code requires you to agree to unfavorable
> terms of service hidden somewhere on the site, including agreeing to
> future (and possibly unwanted) scans, agreeing to allow the company to
> plant malware, and indemnification.
>
> IMHO, I think auto454357 raised some valid concerns. As for the auto
> generated email, he/she used hushmail (instead of
> yahoo/hotmail/gmail), which tells me the person might not fit your
> classification.
>
> Jeff
>
> On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Robin Sage  
> <robin.sage@...ketmail.com> wrote:
>> This definitely sounds like a clueless federal agent.
>> Especially since he uses an autogenerated email address.
>> Get with the program........the internet is wide open for people to  
>> scan.
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: Cody Robertson <cody@...khost.com>
>> To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
>> Sent: Thu, January 7, 2010 10:51:14 AM
>> Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] iiscan
>>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 1/7/10 10:18 AM, auto454357@...hmail.com wrote:
>>> So let me see if I got this the right way.
>>>
>>> You guys are allowing an unknown company to scan for your webapps,
>>> being those apps business critical or not. On top of that, the
>>> unknown company is based on a country where government supports
>>> acts of electronic espionage against other nations, mainly those
>>> where you guys are based.
>>>
>>> Is this correct? or am I missing something?
>>>
>>> [SNIP]
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ