full-disclosure - Re: All China, All The Time

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3af3d47c1001151044x53d80976p20df1e037a3b2f59@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 19:44:33 +0100
From: Christian Sciberras <uuf6429@...il.com>
To: Benji <me@...ji.com>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: All China, All The Time

No, that was actually configuration description; best of luck finding
our facility.

On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 7:42 PM, Benji <me@...ji.com> wrote:
> Actually you were boasting, it was irrelevant to have what you have as a
> security precausion. Infact, one could argue that you were making your setup
> insecure by telling people how you're secured from the get go.
>
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 6:38 PM, Christian Sciberras <uuf6429@...il.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> My question was mostly rhetoric, I tried to imply the point on why
>> computers with sensitive information were;
>> 1. not fully up to date (=>from the top of my had, the exploit had
>> several issues in non-standard browser versions?)
>> 2. running internet explorer (=>more known as a target, nothing against
>> MSIE)
>> 3. used to surf the web (=>why else would you be using IE [rhetoric])
>> 4. not monitored correctly (=>our most sensitive information is stored
>> in a server locked up 5 times, the only way to get in is either
>> getting all the keys or through a remote exploit*)
>>
>> I think the above points violate a couple of rules in security auditing.
>>
>> * I'm not boasting about our configuration; this is very easy to
>> achieve in a company of 5 and one server rack.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 7:08 PM, Peter Besenbruch <prb@...a.net> wrote:
>> > On Thursday 14 January 2010 21:49:05 Christian Sciberras wrote:
>> >> "They used an IE exploit to get in."
>> >> The people at *Google* use *IE*?!! Besides, how does an exploit in IE
>> >> affect the server?
>> >
>> > It would affect a person with login rights to a server.
>> >
>> > This wasn't just an attack on Google, btw, it was an attack on 32
>> > different
>> > companies.
>> > --
>> > Hawaiian Astronomical Society: http://www.hawastsoc.org
>> > HAS Deepsky Atlas: http://www.hawastsoc.org/deepsky
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>> > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>> > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
>

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/