lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <754924961001241124t1fddcd6cv37ce37a2f73e448e@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 01:09:40 +0545
From: Bipin Gautam <bipin.gautam@...il.com>
To: full-disclosure <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Subject: Disk wiping -- An alternate approach?

Dear all,

(I need some feedbacks/insights/comments? on this design concept)

Problem:
- The absence of evidence 9 times out of 10 is just as bad as the
evidence itself in court.
- What you type text or email can, and will, be used against you in a
court of law.


But: Digital Communication" has been the our part of life 24x7 and as
in "advertisement" we the netizens these days tend to "instantly
communicate" as with the "flow of our thought" without thinking all
the time & in every mood state, and even when drunk! Our communication
are as fluid as thoughts nothing more and seriously influenced by day
to day activities and a lot of things.

Because as in one-to-one communication people fake, joke, write to
check a response, simply scare etc in electronic communication
too..... but sadly it gets recorded and people with big equipments and
schizophrenia tent to take it all seriously!

Internet records a blur picture of who we are in "real" nothing more.
Even evidence suggest people tend to think freely? and to any extreme
at privacy of your desktop asif you are talking to yourself instantly.

How does a court sees all that?

Sadly, today we have technology to record it all. If you judge someone
24x7 you may find all evidenced to support all ends of extremes and
anything ?


So, plausible deniability solution for disk wiping?:

Let, disk wiping tools LOAD the whole WIKIPEDIA in nxn matrices and
mix ALL the words & phrases in a random pool continuously and use THIS
as the "Wiping passes and patterns" while they wipe the disk-space
(instead of using random-pass or zero) and let the people who dont
need-to-know make sense of whatever they want to pull up from the
'patterns' generated from the ENCYCLOPEDIA OF KNOWLEDGE & unlimited
keywords and phrases and counter the same?

Is any such software feature allowed by law or is it called "Material
Falsification" ?


[0] Think : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bible_code
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plausible_deniability

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ