full-disclosure - Re: Disk wiping -- An alternate approach?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <754924961001251055i4682009dh41686979f7504570@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 00:40:48 +0545
From: Bipin Gautam <bipin.gautam@...il.com>
To: Michael Holstein <michael.holstein@...ohio.edu>
Cc: full-disclosure <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Disk wiping -- An alternate approach?

Ok, thanks Michael !

I call off all the theories, except: As you told "Possession is
9/10ths of the law" BUT the texts they find can very likely come from
the internet while you browse the internet and not your own possession
and someone typed it from online and it lands on your disk while you
browse it?

DONT MISS THIS MAIN POINT! How does the law sees such a situation?
(and except the possibility of linguistic analysis to prove guilty)

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/