full-disclosure - Re: Disk wiping -- An alternate approach?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a9f4a3861001261107x28807b3es951a0f329fb27269@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 11:07:10 -0800
From: Kurt Buff <kurt.buff@...il.com>
To: full-disclosure <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Disk wiping -- An alternate approach?

On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 00:11, Charles Skoglund
<charles.skoglund@...sec.se> wrote:
> This discussion is getting weirder and weirder. If an examiner finds
> evidence on YOUR computer / cell phone / usb disks / whatever, please do
> tell me how it's not necessarily yours? By claiming your computer has been
> hacked? You do know an examiner usually knows how to double-check your story
> for malicious code right? Or what are you guys talking about?
>
> My experience is that when I find the evidence, the person/s being
> investigated confesses quite rapidly.
>
> Cheers!

I must suggest your experience is quite limited - the case below is not unique:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_of_Connecticut_v._Julie_Amero

Kurt

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/