full-disclosure - Re: Disk wiping -- An alternate approach?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6a5e46471001252016i6d346eadh5e762c7036057fdc@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 22:16:09 -0600
From: Rohit Patnaik <quanticle@...il.com>
To: Bipin Gautam <bipin.gautam@...il.com>
Cc: full-disclosure <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Disk wiping -- An alternate approach?

It depends entirely on how you define "flawed".  As I stated earlier, the
goal of the prosecutor is not some abstract ideal of justice.  It is a
conviction.  Anything they can do within the law to convict you is fair
game.  Using statements that you put on your hard drive certainly falls
under those rules, regardless of what the original intent was.

-- Rohit Patnaik

On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 9:31 PM, Bipin Gautam <bipin.gautam@...il.com>wrote:

> So to the point, the techniques of forensic examiners were flawed from
> day one given that any text/evidence found on your computer is NOT
> NECESSARILY yours! Does that break digital forensics........?
> oops.................
>

Content of type "text/html" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/