full-disclosure - Re: Disk wiping -- An alternate approach?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3af3d47c1001270821t13fa3811k3c33a61b4d029e16@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:21:08 +0100
From: Christian Sciberras <uuf6429@...il.com>
To: Bipin Gautam <bipin.gautam@...il.com>
Cc: "McGhee, Eddie" <Eddie.McGhee@....com>,
	full-disclosure <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Disk wiping -- An alternate approach?

Do I smell smoke?
Go on, prove me right.




On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Bipin Gautam <bipin.gautam@...il.com>wrote:

> Really? How much do you know of computer forensics? Care to Double
> clicked a few forensic tools first............
>
> I bring up this issue here because as you can see the laws are
> different in different country and at places just "possession" of a
> questionable content is a crime, without much analysis from where did
> it come from. Such a logic doesnt hold much water from a technical
> prospective, that is what i was trying to discuss. (but you were so
> much concerned about my english lol )
>
> We were talking on a NEW topic, But if truecrypt is all you know, then
> download truecrypt and add a "custom cascade of ciphers" to your
> truecrypt source code... so that your truecrypt hidden volume will be
> very hard to bruteforced with off the self tools (which is what most
> forensic examiners do, they are tool dependent).....
>
> (i  wish to make fun of you, but maybe another email! ;)
>
>
> -bipin
>
>
> On 1/27/10, T Biehn <tbiehn@...il.com> wrote:
> > You made the argument against youself; apparently you didn't comprehend
> the
> > points made in 90% of the on-topic responces to this thread.
> >
> > On Jan 27, 2010 9:34 AM, "Bipin Gautam" <bipin.gautam@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > McGhee & T Biehn !
> >
> > Thankyou for putting up your "best" argument.... sadly that is the
> > BEST technical thing you happen to pick............. in this topic to
> > comment about........
> >
> > -bipin
> >
> > On 1/27/10, McGhee, Eddie <Eddie.McGhee@....com> wrote: > and also lol @
> > maybe USELESS, try making ...
> >
> >> <bipin.gautam@...il.com<mailto:bipin.gautam@...il.com>> wrote: > >
> Enough
> > noise, Lets wrap up: > >...
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>

Content of type "text/html" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/