Message-ID: <3af3d47c1002040405n32a1ef39g3c704e6a439d99c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 13:05:36 +0100
From: Christian Sciberras <uuf6429@...il.com>
To: Anders Klixbull <akl@...erian.dk>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
Subject: Re: anybody know good service for cracking md5?

FINE. Replace "useful" with "widely popular".




On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 1:04 PM, Anders Klixbull <akl@...erian.dk> wrote:

>  lol they have been useful for years son
> just because YOU never found a use for them doesn't mean noone else has :)
>
>
>
>  ------------------------------
> *From:* Christian Sciberras [mailto:uuf6429@...il.com]
> *Sent:* 4. februar 2010 13:00
> *To:* Anders Klixbull
> *Cc:* Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu; full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
>
> *Subject:* Re: [Full-disclosure] anybody know good service for cracking
> md5?
>
> Uh, in the sense that they are finally becoming *actually* useful...
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Anders Klixbull <akl@...erian.dk> wrote:
>
>>  seems to be cropping in?
>> as far as know rainbow tables has been around for years...
>>
>>
>>
>>  ------------------------------
>> *From:* full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk [mailto:
>> full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk] *On Behalf Of *Christian
>> Sciberras
>> *Sent:* 3. februar 2010 23:02
>> *To:* Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
>> *Cc:* full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
>> *Subject:* Re: [Full-disclosure] anybody know good service for cracking
>> md5?
>>
>>   Actually dictionary attacks seem to work quite well, especially for
>> common users which typically use dictionary and/or well known passwords
>> (such as the infamous "password").
>> Another idea which seems to be cropping in, is the use of hash tables with
>> a list of known passwords rather then dictionary approach.
>> Personally, the hash table one is quite successful, consider that it
>> targets password groups rather than a load of wild guesses.
>>
>> Cheers.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 10:26 PM, <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 03 Feb 2010 23:42:07 +0300, Alex said:
>>>
>>> > i find some sites which says that they can brute md5 hashes and WPA
>>> dumps
>>> > for 1 or 2 days.
>>>
>>> Given enough hardware and a specified md5 hash, one could at least
>>> hypothetically find an input text that generated that hash.  However,
>>> that
>>> may or may not be as useful as one thinks, as you wouldn't have control
>>> over
>>> what the text actually *was*.  It would suck if you were trying to crack
>>> a password, and got the one that was only 14 binary bytes long rather
>>> than
>>> the one that was 45 printable characters long. ;)
>>>
>>> Having said that, it would take one heck of a botnet to brute-force an
>>> MD5 has
>>> in 1 or 2 days. Given 1 billion keys/second, a true brute force of MD5
>>> would
>>> take on the order of 10**22 years.  If all 140 million zombied computers
>>> on the
>>> internet were trying 1 billion keys per second, that drops it down to
>>> 10**16
>>> years or so - or about 10,000 times the universe has been around already.
>>>
>>> I suspect they're actually doing a dictionary attack, which has a good
>>> chance
>>> of succeeding in a day or two.
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>>
>>
>>
>

Content of type "text/html" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists