Message-ID: <422CACF11DC12749A90D4925C40E7746092EC10E@SHWNCEXCH1.SRH-1.local>
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 10:10:26 -0600
From: "James W. Lytle" <jlytle@...enter.com>
To: "full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk" <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Draw a line under this non-sense, seriously

Perhaps as a PROFESSIONAL, you could learn to temper your responses a little more appropriately rather than allowing flames to get the better of you?

This discussion, I agree, should really be continued off-list, off-line or both.

James W. Lytle
Network Analyst
Medical Information Systems
1102 West Macarthur
Shawnee, OK 74804
405.395.5749 (office)
405.647.0364 (pager)
jlytle@...enter.com
 
This electronic message transmission contains information from Unity Health Center which may be confidential or privileged. This information is intended to be for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please notify us immediately by telephone (405-395-5749) or by electronic mail at jlytle@...enter.com.
 


> -----Original Message-----
> From: full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk [mailto:full-disclosure-
> bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk] On Behalf Of james o' hare
> Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2010 1:53 PM
> To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
> Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Draw a line under this non-sense, seriously
> 
> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 3:18 AM, Son of Ram <sonofram@....com> wrote:
> > Andrew,
> >
> > I'm happy that you've made the choice to settle down and have a
> > family.
> >
> > But wait a second, James O'Hare?
> >
> > Your behaviour of using pretextual identities is suspiciously
> > similar to all those escapades we had.
> >
> > Ah, 69? All about the family, isn't that true, Mr. Wallace?
> >
> > Perhaps you should run for political office.
> >
> > Did you meet this girlfriend on Yahoo chat just this morning? I'm
> > sure she feels very safe and secure having an authority-type figure
> > such as yourself with her. ;-)
> >
> > You had about 12 hours to chart a new life course, and I'm positive
> > you won't be back trolling this list ever again.
> >
> 
> It was a good national security & intelligence blog and lot's of
> experts were reading it, there was no reason for you to do what you
> did on Monday, but you decided to do it anyway.
> 
> You ruined it for everyone else in the intelligence community, now
> they are all needing to be added to an invite list and the general
> public aren't being able to read it, because of you.
> 
> If it wasn't for you I wouldn't have been flamed into an argument on
> the list and wouldn't have been banned on January 2009 and I would
> still be contributing good information to the list, such as who I
> think was really behind various cyber attacks that have happened and
> be able to publicly post good cyber security policy suggestions to
> counter the attacks, such as Google Aurora.
> 
> It just means for you less public information from the security &
> intelligence community that you don't get to know about.
> 
> I have access to the information about cyber attacks and policy, I
> could be posting about it all, but that all ended on January 2009
> because of you.
> 
> All been thrown away and is not publicly available information because of
> you.
> 
> I have years of hands on experience in cyber security, have entered
> into the intelligence community and had plenty to offer this list, if
> it wasn't for you who flamed me into an argument on purpose just so
> you could have me banned last year.
> 
> I was never a troll, however you are one big troll.
> 
> You don't have the interest of the security & intelligence community
> at heart, you just create random names to wind people up, I hate you,
> I completely hate you and I'm watching everything your *real body*
> person are up to.
> 
> You wanted people to be more open with the public and release
> information about whats going on but you blew it on January 2009.
> 
> I happily accepted being banned from the list, but you couldn't accept
> it and you started popping up aliases since January 2009 pretending to
> be me and people thought it was me, however it was you.
> 
> I created a national security & intelligence blog instead at the
> beginning of 2010 because I was banned from the list on January 2009
> to offer the public the information that I couldn't post to the list
> because of you.
> 
> However, because of you, I can't even have a public blog now, because
> of you, and now nobody can be open and transparent with the public
> about whats *really* going on because of you.
> 
> Keep the aliases coming, I'm sure our monitoring systems don't link
> them all up and know exactly who is posting even before they reach the
> list as they are travelling over the internet to the list server.
> 
> You had the chance for the intelligence community to be more open with
> the public about what the bad guys are upto but you blew it big time.
> 
> Son of Ram today, what alias will you be using tomorrow?
> 
> Andrew
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists