full-disclosure - Re: Compliance Is Wasted Money, Study Finds

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <g2wf37852831004231515oe155f4c6ia6f462c0dce0d2e6@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 15:15:46 -0700
From: Mike Hale <eyeronic.design@...il.com>
To: Christian Sciberras <uuf6429@...il.com>
Cc: full-disclosure <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>,
	"security-basics@...urityfocus.com" <security-basics@...urityfocus.com>,
	"Thor \(Hammer of God\)" <Thor@...merofgod.com>
Subject: Re: Compliance Is Wasted Money, Study Finds

"Uhm.. No"
Uhm, yes?

It's a 'hassle' if:
You don't have a firewall.
You use default passwords.
You don't protect stored data.
You don't encrypt that data in transit.
You don't use antivirus.
You don't restrict data access.
You don't use unique logins.
You don't log stuff.
You don't test your security regularly.
You don't have an information security policy.

Seriously dude?  It's a hassle?

If you run a secure network, it's cake.  If you don't, it's a very
necessary hassle.

On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Christian Sciberras <uuf6429@...il.com> wrote:
..........
-- 
09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/