lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <806251.32699.qm@web30207.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 22:40:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: Shaqe Wan <sha8e@...oo.com>
To: Pieter de Boer <pieter@...darkside.nl>, full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Compliance Is Wasted Money, Study Finds

 Pieter,


I somehow agree with you that using an AV is not always necessary if you have implemented a good protection for your environment, but I mean in my previous comments that using an AV is a requirement of PCI, it is forced on us. If you deal with CC then you need to get compliant and that means you need to install an AV based on the compliance requirements.

Its a shame, but thats a fact.

Regards,




________________________________
From: Pieter de Boer <pieter@...darkside.nl>
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Sent: Mon, April 26, 2010 5:20:01 PM
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Compliance Is Wasted Money, Study Finds

Shaqe Wan wrote:

> I am not stating that PCI is good in no way, but I am saying that its a
> MUST for companies dealing with CC. And in a windows environment, an AV
> is important.
>
> He probably thought that I am with the rules of PCI, or that I don't
> have any idea that the world is not just WINDOWS !!!
Now you've missed both Nick's and Christian's points ;)

Nick's point was (at least, this is how I understood it ;) that AV is 
not necessarily the best approach to protect your systems against 
malware. If you have implemented a better way to protect your systems 
against malware, but the PCI standard and auditors force you to install 
AV software anyway, then the standard or the auditor's practices are flawed.

Please do remember that adding complexity in the form of AV software can 
have a negative impact on security. The recent McAfee 'svchost.exe' 
debacle is a perfect example.

-- 
Pieter

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/



      
Content of type "text/html" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ