[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <A5DB78B2-1BF4-4DBA-8D1A-90DB1417E017@doxpara.com>
Date: Sat, 1 May 2010 15:29:25 -0400
From: Dan Kaminsky <dan@...para.com>
To: Georgi Guninski <guninski@...inski.com>
Cc: "full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk" <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Subject: Re: newest category of security bugs considered
elite ?
I really like the hash length declaration bugs, where the client can
tell the server how many bytes of a hash need to be validated. (Yep,
you just say "one byte is plenty")
SNMPv3 and XML-DSIG both fell to this, catastrophically.
On May 1, 2010, at 2:23 PM, Georgi Guninski <guninski@...inski.com>
wrote:
> ok, we had a flame.
>
> what is the newest category of sekurity bugz that is considered
> elite ?
>
> basically, int. over., BO are generally considered elite yet barely
> new.
> XSS probably is not elite by 3l33t majority opinion.
>
> i was looking in the past and my heart was not beating fast ;-)
>
> --
> joro
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists