[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <j2w50e4ca0b1005031056m59fb8084q724492ed05fee45a@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 10:56:14 -0700
From: J Roger <securityhocus@...il.com>
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: go public to avoid jail
>
> I can see that you have no experience with the legal system other than
> what you've seen on TV (which is, to say, none at all).
>
I know this is the Internet but you don't need to be quite so rude. Perhaps
I just haven't been arrested (caught) as many times as you have.
If you read
> the IRC logs presented by the prosecution, it is pretty clear what the
> motive was.
>
I have not seen these IRC logs. Have you? Could you provide a reference for
them please?
JRoger
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Ed Carp <erc@...ox.com> wrote:
> I can see that you have no experience with the legal system other than
> what you've seen on TV (which is, to say, none at all). If you read
> the IRC logs presented by the prosecution, it is pretty clear what the
> motive was. Your "release it to the public and you have no liability"
> argument will land you in prison if you try it - go to any attorney
> and ask. Your emotional "prove Stephen is a saint" attempt at
> twisting what happens in the legal system doesn't change the FACT that
> the burden of proof was easily met by the prosecution and that the
> defense's arguments, while designed to sway people more used to
> emotional appeals than logic, did little to impress the court, with
> very predictable results.
>
Content of type "text/html" skipped
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists