full-disclosure - Re: go public to avoid jail

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <o2g1b0d006c1005031124rfad4d0f4ld45382b78e466c85@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 11:24:43 -0700
From: Ed Carp <erc@...ox.com>
To: full-disclosure <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Subject: Re: go public to avoid jail

There were excerpts in the Wired article, and there are more in the
court record - I'll see if I can find the link in my browser history.
Quite interesting reading, actually...

On 5/3/10, J Roger <securityhocus@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>> I can see that you have no experience with the legal system other than
>> what you've seen on TV (which is, to say, none at all).
>>
>
> I know this is the Internet but you don't need to be quite so rude. Perhaps
> I just haven't been arrested (caught) as many times as you have.
>
> If you read
>> the IRC logs presented by the prosecution, it is pretty clear what the
>> motive was.
>>
>
> I have not seen these IRC logs. Have you? Could you provide a reference for
> them please?
>
>
> JRoger
>
> On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Ed Carp <erc@...ox.com> wrote:
>
>> I can see that you have no experience with the legal system other than
>> what you've seen on TV (which is, to say, none at all).  If you read
>> the IRC logs presented by the prosecution, it is pretty clear what the
>> motive was.  Your "release it to the public and you have no liability"
>> argument will land you in prison if you try it - go to any attorney
>> and ask.  Your emotional "prove Stephen is a saint" attempt at
>> twisting what happens in the legal system doesn't change the FACT that
>> the burden of proof was easily met by the prosecution and that the
>> defense's arguments, while designed to sway people more used to
>> emotional appeals than logic, did little to impress the court, with
>> very predictable results.
>>
>

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/