[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201005141119.o4EBJiie031163@bari.maths.usyd.edu.au>
Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 21:19:44 +1000
From: paul.szabo@...ney.edu.au
To: marsh@...endedsubset.com
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Mathematica on Linux
/tmp/MathLink vulnerability
Dear Marsh,
Personal opinions (hoping not to start a flame war) on your questions:
> A. Does anyone think there would be much gained by me requesting (or
> insisting on) a CVE number?
I do not see the need for CVEs for such "trivial" (easily verifiable)
problems. I find them useful when problems or fixes are reported in
"obscure" software (e.g. in binary-only proprietary distributions), so
as to identify same-known-problem reports.
> B. Does anybody actually care about local escalations any more, or is
> everyone just expected to have their very own personal virtual private
> cloud for a security boundary?
We each must protect our own cocoons. Saving the world is impossible.
Cheers, Paul
Paul Szabo psz@...hs.usyd.edu.au http://www.maths.usyd.edu.au/u/psz/
School of Mathematics and Statistics University of Sydney Australia
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists