lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 21:19:44 +1000
Subject: Re: Mathematica on Linux
	/tmp/MathLink	vulnerability

Dear Marsh,

Personal opinions (hoping not to start a flame war) on your questions:

> A. Does anyone think there would be much gained by me requesting (or
> insisting on) a CVE number?

I do not see the need for CVEs for such "trivial" (easily verifiable)
problems. I find them useful when problems or fixes are reported in
"obscure" software (e.g. in binary-only proprietary distributions), so
as to identify same-known-problem reports.

> B. Does anybody actually care about local escalations any more, or is
> everyone just expected to have their very own personal virtual private
> cloud for a security boundary?

We each must protect our own cocoons. Saving the world is impossible.

Cheers, Paul

Paul Szabo
School of Mathematics and Statistics   University of Sydney    Australia

Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia -

Powered by blists - more mailing lists