[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <14206.1275395662@localhost>
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2010 08:34:22 -0400
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: rajendra prasad <rajendra.palnaty@...il.com>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Why the IPS product designers concentrate on
server side protection? why they are missing client protection
On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 13:08:32 +0530, rajendra prasad said:
> Request length is less than the response length.So, processing small amount
> of data is better than of processing bulk data. Response may have encrypted
> data. Buffering all the client-server transactions and validating signatures
> on them is difficult.
All of that is total wanking. The *real* reason why IPS product designers
concentrate on servers is because hopefully the server end is run by some
experienced people with a clue, and maybe even hardened to last more than
35 seconds when a hacker attacks. Meanwhile, if anybody designed an IPS for
the client end, it would just get installed on an end-user PC running Windows,
where it will have all the issues and work just as well as any other
anti-malware software on an end-user PC.
Oh - and there's also the little detail that a site is more likely to buy
*one* software license to run on their web server (or whatever), rather than
the hassle of buying and administering 10,000 end-user licenses. Especially
when an IPS on the client end doesn't actually tell you much about attacks
against the valuable target (the server) from machines you haven't installed
the end-user IPS on (like the entire rest of the Internet).
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists