full-disclosure - Re: No anti-virus software? No internet connection

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 09:47:01 +0200
From: "Walter van Holst" <walter.van.holst@...all.nl>
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: No anti-virus software? No internet connection

On Thu, June 24, 2010 09:42, Cor Rosielle wrote:
> ...snip...
>> The product that fail miserably, throughout the year(s?) should be
>> declared "unfit for purpose" .......like an expired food which is
>> harmful for health.
>
> Basically it is an interesting thought. I see a challenge though. Is 3
> failures per year miserable? Or should we raise the limit to 10? Or
> lower it
> to 1? You get the point. The criteria to determine if a product fails

The answer to that kind of question is quite often related to the
industry average. For example no more failures than one standard
deviation below the industry average.

Regards,

 Walter

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/