full-disclosure - Re: Should nmap cause a DoS on cisco routers?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1278017067.6123.76.camel@lab106ej.Outpost24BV.loc>
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 22:44:27 +0200
From: Cor Rosielle <cor@...post24.com>
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Should nmap cause a DoS on cisco routers?

All,

Robert lee (A good friend of late Jack Louis, the author of unicornscan)
explained to me that unicornscan does support a function like -iL does
in nmap. Just supply the name of the file with hosts as an argument:
unicornscan filename

It is as easy as that.

Thanks again for explaining, Robert.

Cor

On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 05:41 +0000, cor@...post24.com wrote:
> During my training classes I always tell the -sV switch is dangerous and known to (sometimes) crash the target.  
> 
> Usually a better tool to test open udp ports is unicornscan, but that doesn't have a switch like -iL. Since you are testing your own devices and you know the community string, you could insider to loop through the list of IP's and snmpget a value from the MIB. 
> 
> Cor
> 
> sent from a mobile device 
...snip...

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/