full-disclosure - Re: Should nmap cause a DoS on cisco routers?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100702113447.GA23835@bundy.vistech.net>
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 07:34:47 -0400
From: "Champ Clark III [Softwink]" <champ@...twink.com>
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Should nmap cause a DoS on cisco routers?

On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 01:31:07PM +0200, Christian Sciberras wrote:
> > I've noticed that even if the orginazation has a
> very capable security staff
> > Again,  it's a environment that's 'magical' and not well
> understood so once it's 'working',  don't touch anything!
> 
> If you call that "capable security staff" I'd expect you to call Windows a
> "unix-like" os...

	Hah.  I probably didn't make my point properly.   They _have_
a capable security staff that was instructed by "upper management"
_not_ to touch the VoIP network.   They _wanted_ to,  but where 
instructed to 'stay away!'.   Sad state. 

-- 
        Champ Clark III | Softwink, Inc | 800-538-9357 x 101
                     http://www.softwink.com

GPG Key ID: 58A2A58F
Key fingerprint = 7734 2A1C 007D 581E BDF7  6AD5 0F1F 655F 58A2 A58F
If it wasn't for C, we'd be using BASI, PASAL and OBOL.

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/