[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2010 00:20:52 -0700
From: coderman <coderman@...il.com>
To: "Tomas L. Byrnes" <tomb@...neit.net>
Cc: funsec@...uxbox.org, full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk,
Joel Esler <joel.esler@...com>, Gadi Evron <ge@...uxbox.org>
Subject: Re: [funsec] The Economist, cyber war issue
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 7:36 PM, Tomas L. Byrnes <tomb@...neit.net> wrote:
> ....
> I strongly disagree. Since the vector of source attack against most CI
> is from the "great unwashed" protecting the "great unwashed" from being
> turned into zombies, or at least, if they are zombies, from being
> controlled, is a major public benefit.
cite your sources. we're talking warfare against critical
infrastructure here, not cyber crime or security theater. "i can use a
single keystroke to take down the grid and collapse civilization!"
you're never going to secure the great unwashed.*
i challenge you to cites sources justifying your assertions!
> There's even a patent app on it, owned by AT&T: USPTO app 20060031575
i'm more a fan of their mobile telco on a truck kits. to each their own...
(you can mitigate a flood with some smart switches, but no logic can
repair a modest synchronized DWDM outage nor match its practical
impact.)
* i reserve the right to re-evaluate this statement of truth after the
32bit time_t debacle in 2038. until then this is a conservative
assessment.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists