full-disclosure - Re: Paper on the law and Implantable Devices security

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AANLkTik0GDBx2rureeoxH+YjMt1i_qAtB6VQFOs1Va8j@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 07:05:14 -0400
From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader@...il.com>
To: Gadi Evron <ge@...uxbox.org>
Cc: FunSec <funsec@...uxbox.org>, full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Paper on the law and Implantable Devices
	security

> ...even if from the legal standpoint with the
> main concern of liability.
Should that be lack of liability? (Its amazing what corporate America
gets away with by bribing congress (err, 'PAC contributions'))

On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 6:44 AM, Gadi Evron <ge@...uxbox.org> wrote:
> A new research paper from the Freedom And Law Center deals with issues
> that some of us keep raising these past few years, and does a good job
> at it - bionic hacking (or cybernetic hacking if you prefer).
>
> "Killed by Code: Software Transparency in Implantable Medical Devices"
> outlines some of the history of these devices and even shows some cases
> where devices have been recalled (likely due to software issues).
>
> Some of the paper's recommendations are especially interesting, such as
> to create a database of implantable devices code, so that if the vendor
> disappears it can still be patched (I rephrased).
>
> While unintentional, I am considered the father of this field (not that
> I'm complaining) and I can't even begin to tell you how excited I am
> that a field I have been evangelizing for some years now if finally
> getting more attention -- even if from the legal standpoint with the
> main concern of liability.
>
> Still, I can't help but maintain some skepticism that before some
> disaster happens (to us or others) this won't be taken too seriously.
>
> The paper can be found here:
> http://www.softwarefreedom.org/resources/2010/transparent-medical-devices.html
>
> Here's a 2007 Wired article covering the subject from a talk I gave,
> covering the subject from a different perspective:
> http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2007/08/will-the-bionic/
>

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/