lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <991D7FD6-3FD8-4F15-A69E-42D0B45FF9C8@breim.com.br>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 19:23:20 -0300
From: Paulo Cesar Breim (PCB) <paulo@...im.com.br>
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: OpenDNS is acting improperly !!!

Dear everyone,


People who have changed their DNS Server to use the popular OpenDNS (208.67.222.222; 208.67.220.220) are victims of a dangerous decision taken by OpenDNS.

When a user tries to access a non-existing host, OpenDNS manipulates the result and provides the user with its own IP address. For example:

Let us try to find the following server: “microsoft.apple.com” 
If you are using OpenDNS and ping the above server this is what you get:

===================
PING microsoft.apple.com (67.215.65.132): 56data bytes
64 bytes from 67.215.65.132: icmp_seq=0 ttl=49 time=192.743 ms
64 bytes from 67.215.65.132: icmp_seq=1 ttl=49 time=194.997 ms
64 bytes from 67.215.65.132: icmp_seq=2 ttl=49 time=200.954 ms
^C
--- microsoft.apple.com ping statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 192.743/196.231/200.954/3.464 ms
===================

OpenDNS is telling the user that the server “microsoft.apple.com” not only exists but its IP address is 67.215.65.132 !!!
..and who is this IP?  it is OPENDNS-NET-3.

If, instead, you use Google’s DNS and ping the above server, this is what you get:

===================
PCB-2:~ paulo$ ping microsoft.apple.com
ping: cannot resolve microsoft.apple.com: Unknown host
PCB-2:~ paulo$ 
===================

Which is the most adequate reply from the DNS server.

So my suggestion is that you should select and use a TRUE DNS Server.

Paulo Cesar Breim

People who have changed their DNS Server to use the popular OpenDNS (208.67.222.222; 208.67.220.220) are victims of a dangerous decision taken by OpenDNS.

When a user tries to access a non-existing host, OpenDNS manipulates the result and provides the user with its own IP address. For example:

Let us try to find the following server: “microsoft.apple.com” 
If you are using OpenDNS and ping the above server this is what you get:

===================
PING microsoft.apple.com (67.215.65.132): 56data bytes
64 bytes from 67.215.65.132: icmp_seq=0 ttl=49 time=192.743 ms
64 bytes from 67.215.65.132: icmp_seq=1 ttl=49 time=194.997 ms
64 bytes from 67.215.65.132: icmp_seq=2 ttl=49 time=200.954 ms
^C
--- microsoft.apple.com ping statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 192.743/196.231/200.954/3.464 ms
===================

OpenDNS is telling the user that the server “microsoft.apple.com” not only exists but its IP address is 67.215.65.132 !!!
..and who is this IP?  it is OPENDNS-NET-3.

If, instead, you use Google’s DNS and ping the above server, this is what you get:

===================
PCB-2:~ paulo$ ping microsoft.apple.com
ping: cannot resolve microsoft.apple.com: Unknown host
PCB-2:~ paulo$ 
===================

Which is the most adequate reply from the DNS server.

So my suggestion is that you should select and use a TRUE DNS Server.

Paulo Cesar Breim
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ