[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5662.1280796135@localhost>
Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2010 20:42:15 -0400
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: bk <chort0@...il.com>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk,
"Paulo Cesar Breim \(PCB\)" <paulo@...im.com.br>
Subject: Re: OpenDNS is acting improperly !!!
On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 15:53:45 PDT, bk said:
> Except for very few edge cases, anything that makes a DNS resolution call
> (ping, dig, nslookup, host, telnet, curl, whatever) are all going to get the
> same results (um, that's what DNS is designed to do),
In fact, that's one of the biggest reasons people don't like DNS redirection - the
people doing it have an annoying target of redirecting to a machine that has a
supposedly helpful service on port 80, but doesn't do squat for any other service
that got typo-redirected.
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists