[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <10420.1282885505@localhost>
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 01:05:05 -0400
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: Dan Kaminsky <dan@...para.com>
Cc: "full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk" <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Subject: Re: DLL hijacking with Autorun on a USB drive
On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 20:39:04 PDT, Dan Kaminsky said:
> There may very well be a legitimate boundary cross from this DLL
> stuff, but we haven't seen it yet. All the present stuff has the
> indelible mark of a false boundary, in that no fix can be imagined
> that actually closes the vector.
Oh you're wrong there Dan. I can imagine fixes that would close the
vector (starting with fixes that impose a legitimate enforcable boundary).
Fixes that will be accepted by Joe Sixpack? I think we saw where UAC ended up. :)
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists