full-disclosure - Re: DLL hijacking POC (failed, see for yourself)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8b383846e115974188becdac8b9ba068@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 09:41:16 -0400
From: Larry Seltzer <larry@...ryseltzer.com>
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: DLL hijacking POC (failed, see for yourself)

FYI everyone, ACROS has fixed the POC for 64-bit systems. The old one
failed on my Win7 64-bit and the new one works.

http://www.binaryplanting.com/test.htm

I did notice that if you just click on the link
(\\www.binaryplanting.com\demo\windows_address_book_64) Windows turns it
into a file:// url and opens it in the default browser (Chrome in my
case). The POC won't work because there's no remote CWD (at least I
imagine there isn't).  If this is consistent behavior then I think it's a
serious mitigation, since users typically click on links, not open
Explorer and paste them.

Am I wrong on Windows behavior here?

LJS

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/