[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <722375.73671.qm@web137415.mail.in.yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 21:16:35 +0530 (IST)
From: Nikhil Mittal <nikhil_uitrgpv@...oo.co.in>
To: Michal Zalewski <lcamtuf@...edump.cx>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Nmap NOT VULNERABLE to Windows DLL Hijacking
Vulnerability
>>Here's my definition
>>Exploitable vulnerability = vulnerability
>>Non-exploitable "vulnerability" = mental masturbation
Nice definition. I would like to add one more line for my definition
Inability to recognize a straight forward vulnerability = mentally handicap
Nikhil Mittal
--- On Fri, 10/9/10, Michal Zalewski <lcamtuf@...edump.cx> wrote:
From: Michal Zalewski <lcamtuf@...edump.cx>
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Nmap NOT VULNERABLE to Windows DLL Hijacking Vulnerability
To: "Nikhil Mittal" <nikhil_uitrgpv@...oo.co.in>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk, "Fyodor" <fyodor@...ecure.org>
Date: Friday, 10 September, 2010, 4:23 AM
> Please, try to figure out the difference b/w exploitability and vulnerability.
Here's my definition
Exploitable vulnerability = vulnerability
Non-exploitable "vulnerability" = mental masturbation
HTH,
/mz
Content of type "text/html" skipped
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists