lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <722375.73671.qm@web137415.mail.in.yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 21:16:35 +0530 (IST)
From: Nikhil Mittal <nikhil_uitrgpv@...oo.co.in>
To: Michal Zalewski <lcamtuf@...edump.cx>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Nmap NOT VULNERABLE to Windows DLL Hijacking
	Vulnerability

>>Here's my definition

>>Exploitable vulnerability = vulnerability
>>Non-exploitable "vulnerability" = mental masturbation

Nice definition. I would like to add one more line for my definition

Inability to recognize a straight forward vulnerability = mentally handicap



Nikhil Mittal



--- On Fri, 10/9/10, Michal Zalewski <lcamtuf@...edump.cx> wrote:

From: Michal Zalewski <lcamtuf@...edump.cx>
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Nmap NOT VULNERABLE to Windows DLL Hijacking Vulnerability
To: "Nikhil Mittal" <nikhil_uitrgpv@...oo.co.in>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk, "Fyodor" <fyodor@...ecure.org>
Date: Friday, 10 September, 2010, 4:23 AM

> Please, try to figure out the difference b/w exploitability and vulnerability.

Here's my definition

Exploitable vulnerability = vulnerability
Non-exploitable "vulnerability" = mental masturbation

HTH,
/mz



Content of type "text/html" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ