[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=ZoPyubCe50VyAzwYB04kDV8-aD0wiGFCz5Vib@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 18:54:27 -0400
From: Dan Kaminsky <dan@...para.com>
To: Stefan Kanthak <stefan.kanthak@...go.de>
Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: DLL hijacking with Autorun on a USB drive
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Stefan Kanthak <stefan.kanthak@...go.de> wrote:
> Dan Kaminsky wrote:
>
>> h0h0h0. There be history, Larry.
>>
>> Short version: Go see how many DLLs exist outside of c:\windows\system32.
>> Look, ye mighty, and despair when you realize all those apps would be broken
>> by CWD DLL blocking.
>
> No, that's the too much shortened version.
> The correct version but is: Go see how many DLLs exist outside of the DLL
> search path.
> CWD DLL blocking does NOT break all those apps!
> Apps which install their DLLs into their own application directory won't
> notice CWD blocking at all.
>
> And apps which break can be easily fixed:
>
> [HKLM\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\App Paths\application.exe]
> "Path"=...
>
> exists for more than 15 years now.
>
> Stefan
>
>
An automatic patch that breaks random apps will not be an automatic
patch -- and neither will the twenty patches after it.
Nobody cares that the breakage "can be fixed" with some fifteen year old key.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists