lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <AANLkTimD4RskJXbq1Z-Qs9DNbsZPRat-jLuZx0O63HEd@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 15:43:31 -0700 From: BMF <badmotherfsckr@...il.com> To: Charles Timko <charles.timko@...mail.com> Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk Subject: Re: wikileaks still under attack, pressure revved up On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Charles Timko <charles.timko@...mail.com> wrote: > Agreed. I am all for the transparency, but WL is possibly putting our troops > at risk by releasing military strategy. I wouldn't expect JA to think that From: http://articles.cnn.com/2010-10-16/us/wikileaks.assessment_1_julian-assange-wikileaks-documents?_s=PM:US The online leak of thousands of secret military documents from the war in Afghanistan by the website WikiLeaks did not disclose any sensitive intelligence sources or methods, the Department of Defense concluded. So some are playing it up but the top dude at the Pentagon is playing it down. Who ya gonna believe? Unless someone can point to a verified leaked document online which says "Mohammed Jihad Dirka Dirka who lives at <lat/long> told us Osama is in that house over there" or some such I can't believe such information is being distributed. BMF _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists