| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <4CC1DCC4.3010804@btinternet.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 19:49:40 +0100
From: Colin Copley <colin.75@...nternet.com>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: wikileaks still under attack,
pressure revved up
The more knowledge of your enemy tactics you have the better no?
And though I would still prefer actual proof of the info, the Pentagon
top brass debunking is something they would do if it were true as well?
Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote:
>
> As a result, even 100% perfect knowledge of our tactics wouldn't
> translate into all *that* big an increase in attack effectiveness, unless
> hidden in that 5% is a "ventilation shaft that leads directly to the reactor
> core" flaw in our tactics ("Every 3rd Tuesday, we do XYZ and one very small
> bomb in the right place would set off a chain reaction of all the munitions on
> the base").
>
>
> I believe the "endangers our sources" part has already been debunked
> by the top leadership at the Pentagon.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists