full-disclosure - Re: 0-day "vulnerability"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1695451927-1288283828-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-633930249-@bda309.bisx.produk.on.blackberry>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:38:03 +0000
From: w0lfd33m@...il.com
To: "Curt Purdy" <infosysec@...il.com>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk,
	full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: 0-day "vulnerability"

Even my dictionary doesn't have it but if it suits the most, we have include it ;)

------Original Message------
From: Curt Purdy
To: w0lfd33m@...il.com
Cc: full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] 0-day "vulnerability"
Sent: Oct 28, 2010 10:01 PM

OK, good points.

And since my mac dictionary widget doesn't have the term yet, I vote
for "0day dis" It has a nice ring to it ;)

Curt


On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 12:24 PM,  <w0lfd33m@...il.com> wrote:
> Yep. Totally agree. Vulnerability exists in the system since it has been developed. It is just the matter when it has been disclosed or being exploited.
>
> I would suggest " 0 day disclosure" instead of "0 day vulnerability" :)
>
>
> ------Original Message------
> From: Curt Purdy
> Sender: full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk
> To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
> Subject: [Full-disclosure] 0-day "vulnerability"
> Sent: Oct 28, 2010 8:48 PM
>
> Sorry to rant, but I have seen this term used once too many times to
> sit idly by. And used today by what I once thought was a respectable
> infosec publication (that will remain nameless) while referring to the
> current Firefox vulnerability (that did, by the way, once have a 0-day
> sploit)  Also, by definition, a 0-day no longer exists the moment it
> is announced ;)
>
> For once and for all: There is no such thing as a "zero-day
> vulnerability" (quoted), only a 0-day exploit...
>
> Curt Purdy CISSP, GSNA, GSEC, MCSE+I, CCNA
>
>_______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
>
> Sent from BlackBerry® on Airtel


Sent from BlackBerry® on Airtel
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/