lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <681960.61112.qm@web120315.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 17:04:27 -0700 (PDT)
From: Josey Yelsef <hg_exposed@...oo.com>
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: 0-day "vulnerability"
Great way to split hairs. Fumbling between metaphors, you're better off contacting Merriam-Webster.
--- On Thu, 10/28/10, Michal Zalewski <lcamtuf@...edump.cx> wrote:
From: Michal Zalewski <lcamtuf@...edump.cx>
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] 0-day "vulnerability"
To: "Curt Purdy" <infosysec@...il.com>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Date: Thursday, October 28, 2010, 10:02 PM
> For once and for all: There is no such thing as a "zero-day
> vulnerability" (quoted), only a 0-day exploit...
Cool story, bro.
Any thoughts on the use of the term "hacker"?
/mz
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Content of type "text/html" skipped
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists