full-disclosure - Re: Evilgrade 2.0 - the update explotation framework is back

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AANLkTimWEjdRG0wXYtgcuLdDMt+fLrA31R5NwEmpiKXq@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 12:32:19 -0400
From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader@...il.com>
To: Jhfjjf Hfdsjj <taser3000@...oo.com>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Evilgrade 2.0 - the update explotation
 framework is back

On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Jhfjjf Hfdsjj <taser3000@...oo.com> wrote:
>
>
>>On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 10:36 AM,  <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu> wrote:
>> >On Sun, 31 Oct 2010 13:09:27 BST, Mario Vilas said:
>>>
>>> >Just signing the update packages prevents this attack, so it's not that hard
>>>> to fix.
>>>
>>> Except if a signing key gets compromised, as happened to one Linux vendor
>>> recently, causing a lot of kerfluffle...
>
>>??? Are you ptoposing to throw the baby out with the bath water ??? I
>>would not have expected that from *.edu.
>
> I do not believe anyone is 'ptoposing' anything. All he said was that package
> signing should not be taken as a silver bullet, for experience has shown that
> the key's themselves are capable of being compromised if a vendor is
> successfully attacked.
>
> Exactly what I would expect from *.edu
I read differently,

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/