[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <140145.13653.qm@web113412.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 14:08:26 -0800 (PST)
From: Troy Canasta <kingofpainfosec@...il.com>
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Open Letter to Lee Vartan,
Assistant United States Attorney in regards to the Goatse Security
iPad case.
First off, sorry for my errors. Down the road. Hangs.
I'd like to add, your case is pretty insignificant and you're just another
script kiddie.
DoJ handled tons real SNAFU's. It's not like you're this guy the public will
sympathize with. You're a delinquent.
I hope you are in fact trolling, because you're not a free speech hero, you're a
common criminal. You're not a hacker, but you're a hack. Get it!?
I eat thugs like you for breakfast. Enjoy prison! You will get all the GNAA
(Minus the AA!) you can eat there! I hope they learn to understand your MO very
deeply. Like Goatse. Gaping holes? You can get all the pen testing and hardening
you need in jail!
________________________________
From: Troy Canasta <kingofpainfosec@...il.com>
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Sent: Wed, November 17, 2010 9:49:21 PM
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Open Letter to Lee Vartan, Assistant United
States Attorney in regards to the Goatse Security iPad case.
Clearly, the drugs got to you.
Your decision down the right isn't squabbling with the government, but whether
you should accept a plea or convince a jury of your peers you're not the villain
you are.
Like most criminals, you don't open up on merits of the case. I don't see any
evidence of vigilante activism against pedophiles, infraguard or international
organized crime. It sounds like textbook script kiddie aggrandizement.
This e-mail further enforces you are a thug and a nobody who hang out in a chat
room.
You're not a vigilante organization, you're not a security clique, you're an
agitator. Get a job and start generating some legit GDP or go to college.
________________________________
From: Andrew Auernheimer <gluttony@...il.com>
To: <snip>
Cc: <snip>
Sent: Wed, November 17, 2010 10:14:08 AM
Subject: [Full-disclosure] Open Letter to Lee Vartan, Assistant United States
Attorney in regards to the Goatse Security iPad case.
Howdy Lee,
I was originally outraged by your recent acts towards persecuting me and my
associates and extremely shaken up due to an unjust search which is based upon
multiple violations of the Fourth amendment. I believe that this outrage, the
emotional stress of being placed in solitary confinement for multiple days
without cause and previous harassment by the government lead me to treat you
less respectfully than I should, but as I was at the law library (where I
usually go for ethical guidance) I started reading some Thomas Paine and
experienced a revelation in how I should best proceed in dealing with you and
your actions.
“He that would make his own liberty secure, must guard even his enemy from
oppression; for if he violates this duty, he establishes a precedent that will
reach to himself.” - Thomas Paine, Dissertation on First Principles of
Government
I’m writing you to help clarify this situation we continue to find ourselves in.
It appears that despite the obvious facts regarding the case you continue to
attempt prosecution on me. While information security experts world wide (many
of whom your department hire as expert witnesses), average citizens, law
analysis groups and consumer affairs groups continue to support me; you seem to
still be investigating me for some sort of criminal act.
While I am sure that you are probably under a lot of pressure to produce
something, given that you obtained a secret quasi-legal warrant, have a large
amount of negative publicity on your office and name, and a growing number of
people asking why you are doing this. I’m sure that this pressure is beginning
to wear on your personal and professional relationships, and as I am and always
have been a supporter of the United States Government, I’d like to offer some
friendly advice before irreparable damages from your actions spread to the rest
of the Department of Justice.
There are a few options available to you at this point:
1. Continue holding Grand Jury sessions and force an indictment. I can in no way
advise this as it will cause harm to your professional reputation, and force the
Department of Justice towards a path of manufacturing evidence. Social
responsibility has always been at the core of everything we do at Goatse
Security, and this will be extraordinarily obvious at a trial. Goatse has done
large amounts of documented work in the areas of fighting havens for pedophiles
worldwide, protecting US infrastructure, and keeping US citizens safe from
Russian and Chinese organized crime. The DoJ has also done this, and quite well
at times, but we should work together for a common goal, instead of fighting
each other, and wasting our fiscal and legal resources. We do not have a large
advertising budget like the DoJ and FBI have, and our publicity comes from
citizen recognition of national stewardship. I hope that you don’t see this as
competition to your own great work in the area, but we believe that we could
both do better.
2. Stop this investigation. Given the vulnerable position you’ve placed the DoJ
in with these actions, you may be required to resign. I am very sorry that this
is the position you find yourself in, but there are many great opportunities
available for you in the private sector, and just because you are not getting
paid by the government does not mean that you will not be able to help make the
country a better, safer and healthier place for us all to enjoy. We do volunteer
work daily, and accomplish this in our free time funded by our private sector
work. We find this the most kind healthy form of patriotism, as it not only
allows one to help in areas freely, but minimizes bureaucratic costs which we
are all bear as brothers and sisters in this great nation.
3. Publicly accept assistance from Goatse Security. While the smear campaign
your agency has launched against this group and me personally may make this
difficult, I’m sure that fully disclosing the rationale for it would grant you
and the DoJ forgiveness from the public, as well as from myself. As always, we
are more then happy to work with you hand in hand towards a better country. If
you are unable to do this for political reasons, we understand, but we would not
want you to dishonor your family (probably the people who put you through law
school) by making choices which are wrong but popular. AT&T needs to be held
accountable for their insecure infrastructure as a public utility and we must
defend the rights of consumers, over the rights of shareholders.
I pray for you Lee. I pray for you to see wisdom in your actions, and pray for
you to be guided towards righteousness. I advise you to discuss this matter with
your family, your friends, victims of crimes you have prosecuted, and your
teachers for they are the people who would have been harmed had AT&T been
allowed to silently bury their negligent endangerment of United States
infrastructure.
Hugs and Courage To You,
Andrew
Content of type "text/html" skipped
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists