full-disclosure - Re: verizon vs m$

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20101207090230.GA2058@sivokote.iziade.m$>
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 11:02:30 +0200
From: Georgi Guninski <guninski@...inski.com>
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: verizon vs m$

do i get it right?:

1. the verizon paper is entirely correct
2. some interpret it as a feature and some as a bug?

On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 11:25:36PM +0200, Georgi Guninski wrote:
> in a world like this, verizon kills exploder bugs:
> 
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/12/03/protected_mode_bypass/
> http://www.verizonbusiness.com/resources/whitepapers/wp_escapingmicrosoftprotectedmodeinternetexplorer_en_xg.pdf
> 
> the language doesn't seem passionate:
> -----
> Finally, Microsoft and other software vendors should clearly document which features do and do not
> have associated security claims. Clearly stating which features make security claims, and which do not,
> will allow informed decisions to be made on IT security issues. 
> -----
> 
> lol
> 
> -- 
> joro
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/