[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTimdWMDNZC=SOo_qv45eBhpAesF4vy6EpY4NChuC@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 22:40:50 +0100
From: Thomas SOETE <thomas@...te.org>
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Linux kernel exploit
Failed on Ubuntu 10.10 (2.6.35-23-generic)
toms@...rost:/tmp$ uname -a
Linux bifrost 2.6.35-23-generic #41-Ubuntu SMP Wed Nov 24 11:55:36 UTC
2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux
toms@...rost:/tmp$ ./a.out
[*] Resolving kernel addresses...
[+] Resolved econet_ioctl to 0xffffffffa03d9610
[+] Resolved econet_ops to 0xffffffffa03d9720
[+] Resolved commit_creds to 0xffffffff810863c0
[+] Resolved prepare_kernel_cred to 0xffffffff81086890
[*] Calculating target...
[*] Triggering payload...
[*] Exploit failed to get root.
2010/12/7 coderman <coderman@...il.com>:
> On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Dan Rosenberg
> <dan.j.rosenberg@...il.com> wrote:
>> ... I've included here a proof-of-concept local privilege escalation exploit...
>> * This exploit leverages three vulnerabilities to get root, all of which were
>> * discovered by Nelson Elhage:
>>...
>> * However, the important issue, CVE-2010-4258, affects everyone, and it would
>> * be trivial to find an unpatched DoS under KERNEL_DS and write a slightly
>> * more sophisticated version of this...
>
> nice :)
>
> clearly demonstrates why risk is complicated and seemingly minor
> defects (worth delaying patches for weeks/months? ;) can combine into
> truly ugly vulnerabilities...
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists