[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D146DB0.1070908@extendedsubset.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 03:53:52 -0600
From: Marsh Ray <marsh@...endedsubset.com>
To: coderman <coderman@...il.com>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: how i stopped worrying and loved the backdoor
> "I agree that there's a good paper in this, I would love to see the
> entropy added by the multi-consumer model quantified, or even an upper
> bound placed on it. In the past when I've given my talk on randomness
> in the OpenBSD network stack, I've discussed this and I always ask for
> someone to come forward with such a paper.
So there are these many hundreds of lines of entropy management code in
OpenBSD implementing what is claimed to be a novel architecture for
random number generation and yet this guy, who is going around giving
talks on it, is expecting someone else to quantify it and "come forward
with a paper"?
This is the kind of stuff that just doesn't make a bit of sense.
> Unfortunately I don't get the impression that the amateur cryptographers
> questioning the OpenBSD PRNG are qualified to produce such a paper (if
> they were, they wouldn't be mailing here, they'd be submitting it to
> real cryptographers for peer review)"
The burden of proof lies with the "amateur cryptographers" making the
security claims about it, not those questioning them.
- Marsh
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists