[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <58DB1B68E62B9F448DF1A276B0886DF16EBD2D27@EX2010.hammerofgod.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 21:01:15 +0000
From: "Thor (Hammer of God)" <thor@...merofgod.com>
To: Zach C <fxchip@...il.com>
Cc: "full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk" <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>,
"Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu" <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu>,
"lists@...com.org" <lists@...com.org>
Subject: Re: Getting Off the Patch
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Zach C [mailto:fxchip@...il.com]
>Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 12:31 PM
>To: Thor (Hammer of God)
>Cc: lists@...com.org; Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu; phocean; full-
>disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
>Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Getting Off the Patch
>
>Just on top of this, I would like to ask a question of Pete in the form of an
>example.
>Just on top of this, I would like to ask a question of Pete in the form of an
>example.
Excellent example. I'd like to also throw one in that has network connectivity consequences. Regarding SQL Slammer - what would have given 100% protection from Slammer. Outside of the obvious ones like firewalls and such which are already deployed. That's a "real life" example, and I'm interesting in what controls would have already been in place.
t
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists