lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=d=QpWCkR6OToFkUR0e4Br-7=uYqHKf9PRMUVh@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 12:05:27 -0800 From: coderman <coderman@...il.com> To: phocean <0x90@...cean.net> Cc: "full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk" <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>, "Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu" <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu> Subject: Re: Getting Off the Patch On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 11:43 AM, phocean <0x90@...cean.net> wrote: > ... how is this new ? It has been the best > practice of good system/security administrators for years. > > And it doesn't look like a "no patching" policy yet... sure, .. though you've made me sad considering how few organizations do "best practice, good system/security administration". not new, still difficult? (~_~;) that leaves consensus: "no patching" elusive, yet to be observed in real-world. (e.g. yeti or bigfeets) _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists