lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <AANLkTikBa1gpN6Jo1qPuaFi6XChuxX4YJmLFF0_DQfrF@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 17:00:44 -0800 From: coderman <coderman@...il.com> To: "Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd]" <cal.leeming@...plicitymedialtd.co.uk> Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu Subject: fs rootkit performance footprint [was Re: "IO wait chains" in Linux??] On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 4:49 PM, coderman <coderman@...il.com> wrote: > ...general idiom is > setup measurement and load injection, then executive to define peak / > best capacity configuration. > ... > oprofile / kprobes /sysprof help with measurement rather than load injection. interestingly, memory backed file system performance benchmarks exhibit a distinct performance degredation depending on the type of kernel mode rootkit hooking implemented on a compromised host. a poor rootkit revealer, but surprisingly effective. a good exercise for reader... _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists