| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <AANLkTinD=x6kYSeG7zMk-KrHyMUWVU--qtLXjv5GF2zM@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 18:37:09 +0000
From: "Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd]"
<cal.leeming@...plicitymedialtd.co.uk>
To: Eyeballing Weev <eyeballing.weev@...il.com>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: HBGary Mirrors?
So here's a thought.
If illegally distributed files (such as this one) were encrypted and hosted
on one server, and the key hosted on another, which server would
be eligible for take down?
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Eyeballing Weev
<eyeballing.weev@...il.com>wrote:
> Cryptome.org is your friend. John Young is pretty much bulletproof when
> it comes to file hosting and laughs at DMCA takedown requests.
>
> On 02/18/2011 11:24 AM, ck wrote:
> > So, the FEDs shut down all mirrors of the HBGary files - or didn't they?
> >
> > ck
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
Content of type "text/html" skipped
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists