[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <0B0EDFD2-F40F-4B53-A8B1-8D58F82DE284@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 19:28:51 -0700
From: bk <chort0@...il.com>
To: imipak <imipak@...il.com>,
Full Disclosure <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Materials regarding Cyber-war
On Mar 23, 2011, at 12:22 PM, imipak wrote:
>
> On 14 March 2011 17:24, bk <chort0@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Mar 14, 2011, at 10:04 AM, imipak wrote:
>
>> On 14/03/11 16:51, bk wrote:
>>
>> >> The point you missed is that almost all the examples we've seen so far have
>> >> been closer to espionage than to actual warfare.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> > Despite that, I agree. Espionage != War. People hyping "cyberwar" are either trying
>> > to increase their sales, budget, or jurisdiction.
>> >
>>
>>
>> "Report: Iran's paramilitary launches cyber attack"
>>
>> http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jlwiVKEhlj8CjRz6dzR-McTlnRHw
>>
>> -i
>
> Yes, let's put a lot of stock in propaganda that amounts to "we're in ur hostin providerz, defacin ur websitez."
>
> This is from the same regime that photoshopped in extra missiles to make their capabilities look stronger.
>
> Grow up.
>
>
>
> *cough*
>
> http://blogs.comodo.com/it-security/data-security/the-recent-ca-compromise/
>
>
> -i
Spying on your own citizens is considered "cyberwar" now? That's *if* (and it's a big if), we actually believe it was an attack sponsored by the Iranian state.
--
chort
Content of type "text/html" skipped
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists