[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110330154257.42395gk0mazbxsw0@jabea.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 15:42:57 -0400
From: jabea@...ea.net
To: Cal Leeming <cal@...whisper.co.uk>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: INSECT Pro 2.5 Release - Web scanner tool
Quoting Cal Leeming <cal@...whisper.co.uk>:
> What this really comes down to... Is the product *worth* donating to? If it
> is, then donate. If it isn't, then don't. I can't personally comment either
> way as I haven't tried it.
>
I agree with you, but in order to test it you *must* donate. First
time I see that.
Unless you email the authors, or are a FD's subcriber and have used
Steven's mirror. (pre 2.5 was tagged free, now it's tagged "There is
no fixed price to get a copy").
I just mean, make a real licensing behind the tool if you want to sell
it, or use a open licensing, but don't play with word in between.
Playing the donation way can be complex, if a user want a receipt for
their donation, can they produce it ? (I don't know USA law, but where
I live only a official non-profit organisation can receive a
'donation'. Else it's simply considered a money gift). Their site
advertise donation as 10, 50 and 100$, again, where I live you have
the obligation to produce receipt for donation over 10$.
But my point is simply they just don't look professionnal, and I judge
them that way because they try to sell the product, not like a GPL
source code or a freeware.
-phil
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists