lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56698b479dcac72fd1ce875424a31722@elitemodscene.com>
Date: Wed, 04 May 2011 06:33:49 -0600
From: <ctruncer@...istophertruncer.com>
To: <nix@...roxylists.com>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Facebook

According to ArsTechnica, Facebook's DMCA takedown process seems to have
some issues as well.

They mentioned that there is essentially no "burden of proof" put on the
individual/company making the claim that someone else is somehow infringing
their IP.  They said someone sent a notice in, and ArsTechnica's facebook
page was taken down without any investigation.  It seems if this happens,
your basically screwed if you aren't Arstechnica, or some other big name
person/company as it took Facebook a while to respond to their requests for
information.

So basically if you want to do a facebook profile DOS to someone (this
being inferred from the article), just write facebook and say that the
target has infringing material on their profile, facebook takes it down
without an investigation, and it would be fairly tough to get it back.



Chris



On Wed, 4 May 2011 15:13:37 +0300, nix@...roxylists.com wrote:
>> found this
>> Facebook Law Enforcement Guidelines
>>
<http://exit.gulli.com/url/http://info.publicintelligence.net/Facebook2010.pdf>
>>
> 
> Interesting. Their guideline does not say anything about a court order
so
> we can assume they give all personal data upon request just like that.
> 
> 
> 
>>
>>
>> On 04.05.11 01:30, Ivan . wrote:
>>> it's the law, specifically CALEA
>>>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communications_Assistance_for_Law_Enforcement_Act
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Javier Bassi <javierbassi@...il.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 7:51 PM, Daniel Clemens
>>>> <daniel.clemens@...ketninjas.net> wrote:
>>>>> Prove it!
>>>>> You clearly know nothing about our legal system.
>>>> You might find this links interesting
>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t0aQojDGSD4
>>>> http://www.google.com/transparencyreport/governmentrequests/
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>>>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>>>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ