full-disclosure - Re: Facebook

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 05 May 2011 09:17:11 +0930
From: Stephen <stephen@...yhat-security.com>
To: Cal Leeming <cal@...whisper.co.uk>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Facebook

Amish not being in the "regular databases" cause they don't use
technology (i.e., like Facebook, or any of the other databases mentioned
previously). A better way to word "It wouldn't just be a selective
subset but pretty much who, where,
when and probably why without too many non-Amish exceptions." would have
been "It wouldn't just be a select subset of people, but basically the
who, where, when, and why of almost everyone, with little to no
exceptions (aside from the Amish and suchlike folk, who obviously don't
use technology). Make sense now? :D

On 05/04/2011 08:28 PM, Cal Leeming wrote:
> Forgive me for being dense but, what does "non-Amish exceptions" means??
>
> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Michael Simpson
> <mikie.simpson@...il.com <mailto:mikie.simpson@...il.com>> wrote:
>
>     On 4 May 2011 04:59, phil <jabea@...ea.net
>     <mailto:jabea@...ea.net>> wrote:
>     >
>     > I don’t agree, google is by far the biggest database of what
>     user want and
>     > look for. If you merge those database (google) and facebook that
>     must make
>     > some leet profiling. (especially when you think that you can
>     easily find
>     > where someone live with phone directory and you can match the ip
>     by sector
>     > too to match the google database)
>     >
>
>     "some leet profiling"
>     if you look at what netflix (supposedly anonymised) + imdb was able to
>     do, or the classic of AOL releasing their searches (again anonymised)
>     then a join of google with facebook is quite a scary prospect.
>     Especially as d of b + partial zip/postcode allows for
>     re-identification most of the time (i believe that d of b + state =
>     85% re-identification).
>     It wouldn't just be a selective subset but pretty much who, where,
>     when and probably why without too many non-Amish exceptions.
>
>     mike
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>     Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>     Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/


Content of type "text/html" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/