full-disclosure - Re: Sony: No firewall and no patches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c756e912e5aeaf2683364276779b46ba@phocean.net>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 11:52:49 +0200
From: phocean <0x90@...cean.net>
To: <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Sony: No firewall and no patches

 Well, but this doesn't seem to be a problem when it comes to lunatic 
 errands of Andrew or Call's porn, so why would it bother to talk about 
 security?

 I want to read how you justify that stateful hardware is useless to 
 check sessions of TCP and upper protocols.
 Of course, it doesn't protect from all kind of attacks and you cited 
 some of these cases, but there are plenty of cases where it is useful.

 On Wed, 11 May 2011 09:29:24 +0000, Dobbins, Roland wrote:
> On May 11, 2011, at 4:22 PM, phocean wrote:
>
>> So why going private?
>
>
> Because full-disclosure isn't the best forum for a lengthy discussion
> of this type.
>
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Roland Dobbins <rdobbins@...or.net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>
>
> 		The basis of optimism is sheer terror.
>
> 			  -- Oscar Wilde
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/